"Of all the arts, movies are the most powerful aid to empathy, and good ones make us better people."
-- Roger Ebert, The Great Movies

Saturday, February 25, 2012

The Purple Rose of Cairo

  • Title:  The Purple Rose of Cairo
  • Director:  Woody Allen
  • Date:  1985
  • Studio:  Orion Pictures / MGM
  • Genre:  Drama
  • Cast:  Mia Farrow, Jeff  Daniels, Dianne Wiest
  • Format:  Color, Widescreen
  • DVD Format:  R1, NTSC

"I'm sorry about the money.  I had no idea." -- Tom
"That's OK, it's not going to be so easy to get along without it in this world."  -- Cecilia
"I guess I'll have to get a job." -- Tom
"That's not going to be so easy, either.  Right now, the whole country is out of  work." -- Cecilia
"Well then, we'll live on love.  We'll have to make some concessions, but so what.  We'll have each other." -- Tom
"That's movie talk." -- Cecilia

"I'm confused.  I'm married.  I just met a wonderful new man, -- he's fictional, but you can't have everything." -- Cecilia

The Purple Rose of  Cairo is set in the 1930s in a small town in New Jersey.  Cecilia (Mia Farrow) is a waitress, and not a very good one at that.  Her husband is a bum, not only in the sense that he's unemployed, which he is, but he treats her terribly -- he beats her when he's drunk, he's disrespectful to her all the time, he takes her wages and spends them on gambling, beer, cigarettes and other women.  And Cecilia isn't even a good waitress - her customers scream at her and tip very little, if  anything.  Her boss screams at her as well.  Cecilia has one escape, one place where she can relax, get away from her awful life, and dream of some place, some thing, better -- the movies.

So once a week, at least, she goes to the local single screen movie theater and watches the movie that's come to town.  And she knows all about the various actors -- their names, their roles, who they're married to and divorced from.  In short, Cecilia is a fan of the movies.  But look at her life:  this is before TV, and the film itself was made before the Internet, computer gaming, or on-line gaming (a "computer game" in the 1980s would have meant an arcade game like Pac-man, or maybe a system attached to the TV with cartridges of games, such as Atari or Intellivision).  Theatre would have been too expensive for a waitress in the '30s (heck it's too expensive for a waitress now) - if her small town even had one.  And, yes, they had radio in the 1930s, but in the major cities like New York, not in small towns, like Cecilia's home in New Jersey.  Besides, maybe she prefers the visual element and the fantasy of  film.

One day, Cecilia catches her husband with another woman -- she tries to leave him, but loses her job as well.  When she bumps into one of  the local "ladies of  the evening" on the street, she realises she has no skills, no job, and no where to go, and she reluctantly goes back to her husband.  But at one point, she ends up at the local movie theater, watching the same film, The Purple Rose of Cairo, over and over and over again.  She's watching the film, quietly crying, when suddenly, the character of  Tom Baxter (Jeff  Daniels) in the film, looks at her and addresses her, before stepping out of  the film to meet her.  Tom and Cecilia run off.

The other actors in the film are perplexed and  try to figure out what to do, being unable to move the story along without Baxter.  The movie house is in a panic.  Audience members are demanding their money back as the actors on the screen do nothing but talk to each other and insult the audience.  The theater owner calls the producer of  the film in Hollywood and RKO (the studio that produced "The Purple Rose of Cairo" in the film). Soon, Hollywood types and the actor who played Tom, Gil Sheppard, are in New Jersey trying to figure out what's happened.  Throughout the film we get snippets of  what's going on, on the screen and with the execs from Hollywood (such as the Tom Baxter character forgetting his lines in Chicago, and eventually Tom Baxter's trying to get out into the real world in Chicago, St. Louis, and Detroit).

Meanwhile, Tom is, Pinnocco -like, is enjoying the fun of being a "real" person -- though he's a bit confused about the real world.  But he's convinced he's in love with Cecilia.

The film moves back and forth between Tom and Cecilia's romance, Cecilia's "real" life, and the Hollywood execs trying to figure out what to do.  Gil Sheppard (the actor who played Tom, also played by Jeff Daniels) arrives and meets Cecilia.  Soon Cecilia's in the midst of  a love triangle, or quadrangle if you include her own husband.  Tom tells Cecilia he's fallen in love with her over and over again.  Before long, Gil is also claiming he's in love with Cecilia.

Tom, having discovered his money isn't real, takes Cecilia to the movie theater.  He takes her into the film and brings her to the Copacobana for a date, then takes her for a night on the town, which is shot in a Art Deco, 1930s-style montage sequence.  After their date, he takes her back to the 'real' world.  There, they run into Gil.  Gil also claims to be in love with Cecilia, and that he will take her away with him to Hollywood.  Cecilia is forced to make a choice - and she does, she chooses Gil.  Tom, the perfect romantic hero, goes back into the film.  Gil has her go home to pack, and when she returns to the movie theater, he and all the Hollywood people have gone.

Soon, Cecilia is back in her old life.  And the last shot of the film is her face, lit by the light of  the silver screen as she watches Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers dance to "Cheek to Cheek" in Top Hat.  Cecilia smiles, just a little bit, as she watches the film, with a Mona Lisa smile.

Cecilia is a representation of  the audience; and how film writers and producers perceive the audience (this is, after all, a Woody Allen film).  She's not dumb - she knows that actors play the characters in the films she watches, and that the films aren't real.  But the escape they provide is something important - not hope exactly. Because Cecilia also knows, especially after her experience with the fictional Tom and the actor Gil, that no White Knight will ride in to town, and take her away from all this.  But films provide some time away from her awful life - her awful job, her terrible husband, and her boring small town.  In short, it's a chance, for a few hours a week,  to pretend she's someone else, or to pretend there actually can be a happy ending.  It's a brilliant commentary on movies, really.

Oddly enough, one weird thing about watching the film now, is that even though it's a period piece, it does look a bit dated.  I couldn't quite put my finger on why, but it does.

Recommendation:  See it!
Rating:  4 out of  5 Stars
Next Film:  The Ref

Monday, February 20, 2012

The Producers

My internet connection is down so I’m writing this off-line and will post when I can.
Review of “The Producers” (watched on 2/19/2011).
2/20/2012 6:51 PM

  •          Title:  The Producers
  •         Director:  Mel Brooks
  •          Date:  1968
  •          Studio:  Embassy Pictures / MGM
  •          Genre:  Comedy, Musical
  •         Cast:  Zero Mostel, Gene Wilder, Dick Shawn, Kenneth Mars, Lee Meredith,
  • Christopher Hewlett, Andreas Voulsinas
  •         Format:  Color, Widescreen
  •          DVD Format:  R1, NTSC

"It's amazing, it's absolutely amazing, but under the right circumstances a producer could make more money with a flop than with a hit!"-- Leo

"But if we get caught, we'll go to prison." – Leo
"You think you're not in a prison now?  Living in a grey little room, going to a grey little job, leading a grey little life?"  -- Max

"Leo, how much percentage of a play can there be altogether?"  -- Max
"Max, you can only sell 100 percent of anything."  -- Leo
"And how much of 'Springtime for Hitler' have we sold?" – Max
"Twenty-five thousand percent." – Leo

Mel Brooks' first comedy film, The Producers, is a tour-de-force.  It's laugh-out-loud funny from beginning to end.  The film is so over-the-top and so funny that what could have easily been a very offensive movie is instead a true comedy classic.   The film first introduces Max Biaylystock (Zero Mostel) – a failing Broadway producer who has gone from running six hit shows simultaneously, to having nothing but a run of failures.  The only way he can find investors now, is by seducing little old ladies for checks made out to "cash".  Leo Bloom (Gene Wilder in only his second film ever) is a mild-mannered accountant.  One day, he's sent to go over Max's books and walks in on him playing sex games with an 80-year-old.  To say that Leo is shocked is an under-statement.  But soon Max gets the old lady to leave, and Leo enters the producer's office.  This opening scene between Max and Leo is hilarious – and sets a slightly surreal, out there, quality for the entire film.

In doing the books, Leo discovers a simple accounting error – Max raised $2000 dollars extra for his last play and never invested it in the play or returned the profit to his investors.  This, Leo points out is fraud.  Max convinces Leo to not turn him in.  The Leo has a lightbulb moment, and innocently says that a producer could make more money with a flop than a hit.  The rest of the film is about the two trying to do just that – produce a flop, and keep all the extra money they've raised from their investors.

Leo, being an honest accountant, though a bit neurotic (his reaction when Max takes his "blue blanket" is screen perfection – as is his breakdown in hysterics slightly later when Max threatens him), so Max must convince Leo to do it.  Max seduces Leo with a day in the park, like an extended date, and it really is Max's kindness that convinces Leo what the heck – he wants everything.

Once he has Leo on board, they must find a play.  And they do – "Springtime for Hitler – a gay romp with Adolph and Eva".  They locate the author, the slightly insane German, Franz Liebkind (Kenneth Mars), and buy the play.  Then Max goes to raise money from his little old lady brigade – in a wonderful montage sequence.  Next, it's casting.  The cattle call for Hitler,is both similar to "A Chorus Line" or the opening of "All that Jazz" (tho' it pre-dates both films, but posssibly not the play of "A Chorus Line") and is quite funny.  But it's the audition of Lorenzo St Dubois (Or "LSD") that is brilliant.  Not only is Dick Shawn's performance brilliant, but the song, "Love Power" and the choreography of the audition, with LDS's band, is priceless.  (Another 60s moment is Max's new Swedish secretary (Lee Meredith) – who speaks no English, and when told to "Go to Work" turns on the record player and starts Go-Go Dancing.)

Soon it is opening night.  Remember – Max and Leo want the play to tank.  The play, "Springtime for Hitler" opens with the big broadway production number, that includes everything:  a parade of beautiful chorus girls in elaborate German-style outfits (including beer steins or preztels on the girls boobs – simply hilarious), a rockets-style section in black leather, and a Bugsy Berkley style overhead shot.  Oh – and the columns turn into cannons that fire at the audience.  The number has to be seen to be believed and is SO over the top, (and SO bad) that no description can do it justice.  Audience members are, of course, shocked, and some even walk out.  Max and Leo go over to a nearby restaurant, to drink and celebrate.

Then LSD takes to the stage as Hitler – and before long the audience is laughing hilariously!  That Franz is in the audience and takes this as an affront adds to the choas – especially when he runs on-stage and is hit over the head, something the audience assumes is part of the play.

Much to the shock of Max and Leo – the play is a hit!  They then decide to blow up the theatre, and end up in court.  Leo actually gives a pretty moving speech defending Max and their friendship.  Soon Max and Leo are behind bars, selling percentages of a new play, Prisoners of Love, to the inmates, and rehearsing.

What makes Brooks' The Producers so funny is in the execution.  Merely writing, or reading, a plot summary just doesn't do the film justice – especially the production number, and any scene with LSD.  Shawn is simply inspired.  But all the actors give the performances of their lives in this – which is why it remains one of Brooks best films.

It goes without saying, but I suppose I must, that Mel Brooks is Jewish.  And he himself has said on numerous occasions, that the way to deal with despots isn't in giving speechs, or using rhetoric or psychology – it's in ridicule and poking fun at them.  The film caught some flak when it was made, but it did  quickly win over it's sophisticated audience once people realised the joke.  And, also, the film is very witty and has a lot of faster-paced dialogue and less reliant on sight-gags than many of Brooks' more recent films (tho' the production number has both sight gags and witty dialogue).  Again, one of Brooks' best films, highly recommended.

Recommendation:  See it!
Rating:  5 of 5 Stars
Next Film:  The Purple Rose of Cairo

Sunday, February 19, 2012

The Princess Bride

  • Title:  The Princess Bride
  • Director:  Rob Reiner
  • Date:  1987
  • Studio:  MGM
  • Genre:  Adventure, Romance, Comedy
  • Cast:  Cary Elwes, Robin Wright,  Fred Savage, Peter Falk, Mandy Patinkin, Chris Sarandon, Christopher Guest, Billy Crystal, Peter Cook, Andre-the-Giant
  • Format:  Color, Widescreen
  • DVD Format:  R1, NTSC
"You fell victim to one of the classic blunders.  The most famous is never get involved in a land war in Asia.  But slightly less well known is this - never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line."  -- Vizzini


"We'll never survive [in the Fire Swamp]."  --  Buttercup, the Princess Bride
"Nonsense, you're only saying that because no one ever has." -- Westley


"You know how much I love watching  you work - but I've got my country's five hundredth anniversary to plan, my wedding to arrange, my wife to murder and Gilder to frame for it.  I'm swamped." -- Prince Humperdinck

The Princess Bride is one of  my favorite films of  all time.  It's a film I actually owned a copy of on VHS, then replaced with a DVD.  I absolutely adore this film -- it's smart, fun, intelligent and chock full of fun and quotable lines.  The film actually has two storylines -- the frame story of a grandfather (Peter Falk) reading the story of  The Princess Bride to his grandson (Fred Savage) who is home sick.  The growing relationship between grandson and grandfather adds a sweetness to the film, as does the young boy's growing interest in the story.  The main storyline, though, is the story of  Westley and Buttercup, two young lovers separated by fate who simply must end-up together.  However, what prevents the story from sinking into typical romantic comedy is the intelligent, witty dialogue and the simply gorgeous cinematography.  The film pulls itself together in such a way that it just works incredibly well.  It's also shot in a very storybook style, which ranges from castles with interiors that obviously look like sets, to some simply wonderful sunsets, and some great scenery when Buttercup and Westley first meet again. (The wide shots of  the castles are no doubt real ones in Ireland and England where parts of  the film were shot).

This film also has some wonderful sword fights.  The fight between Westley and Inigo Montoya is wonderful! I really enjoy it every time I watch the film.  But there's also some wonderful fight scenes between Montoya and the evil Count Rugen.

Overall, the film is just enjoyable.  Simply enjoyable.  It's funny, it's sweet, it's romantic.  The good guys are good because they treat other people nicely and well, and the bad guys - Vizzini, Count Rugen, and Prince Humperdinck are bad guys in part because they treat other people terribly.  Humperdinck's motivation is also to start a war between Florin (his country and home to Buttercup) and neighboring Guilder.  And a bit of wordplay with the names of  the country as well - Florin and Guilder are two coins in a former Netherlands currency.  Florin is also the name of  an old two-shilling coin in the UK that's no longer in use.

If  by some chance you haven't seen this movie, it's an absolutely must-see.

Recommendation:  See it!  Also good for all ages without being overly sweet.
Rating:  5 of 5 Stars
Next Film:  The Producers

Monday, February 13, 2012

The Philadelphia Story

  • Title:  The Philadelphia Story
  • Director:  George Cukor
  • Date:  1940
  • Studio:  MGM
  • Genre:  Romance, Comedy
  • Cast:  Katharine Hepburn, Cary Grant, James Stewart
  • Format:  Black and White, Standard
  • DVD Format:  R1, NTSC
The film opens with Katherine Hepburn throwing out Cary Grant.  Two years later, newspaper headlines announce the upcoming wedding of  Tracy Lord (Hepburn) to a man named "George".  Tracy is a spoiled, self-centered, upper crust, old money, Philadelphia socialite.  She's recently estranged from her father, because he's recently had an affair with a New York dancer.

Grant, an alcoholic playboy, returns to Philadelphia from two years abroad, because he wants to re-kindle his relationship with her, and stop her wedding.  However, he's not completely obvious about what he wants.

Stewart's a newspaperman, a reporter, who dreams of being a real writer, and has written one book of short stories.  But he's currently working at a gossip magazine, and is paired with a female photographer.  He's bribed to cover Tracy's wedding.

Grant and Stewart arrive at Tracy's -- however, the pacing of the film is slow, much slower than is needed for the type of "screwball" romantic comedy that Cukor is trying to build.  I think the film may have been better off in the hands of  Howard Hawks.  Or, for a melancholy feel, Billy Wilder.  But in Cukor's hands, it clunks along.

There are some very funny, witty, clever lines of  dialogue -- but there's also scenes that make one wince, such as Grant insulting Hepburn until she cries -- and he's supposed to be in Philadelphia to woo her back?

Hepburn, meanwhile, starts off as a nearly liberated woman, wearing silky pantsuits, and telling her mother and younger sister, that she dis-invited her father from the wedding because of  his affair.

Meanwhile, Hepburn ends up having an illuminating conversation, not to mention a few kisses with James Stewart, while she's drunk.  The next day, her wedding day, she can't remember exactly what she did.  At first, evidence suggests she slept with Stewart, which ticks off  her fiance', George.  However, Stewart clears the air by explaining nothing happened.  George forgives Hepburn -- but, to her credit, she doesn't forgive him for jumping to conclusions about her and she cancels the wedding.  Then, as she's announcing this to the guests -- Grant, who's feeding her lines to make the embarrassing situation more graceful, proposes.  She accepts, and the wedding goes on -- with Hepburn marrying Grant.  It's also suggested that Stewart's female photographer should marry him, so at least Stewart isn't left in the cold.

The problem with the film -- well, it's almost like a updated "Taming of  the Shrew".  Yes, Tracy Lord is a spoiled, pampered woman who has difficulty expressing her emotions, and thus seems to be an ice queen.  She compared to a "goddess" several times in the film, and never favorably.  However, her abilities at horseback riding, swimming, and sailing suggest she's a true "outdoorsy" woman -- and a woman who doesn't need a man, she needs to be allowed to do her own thing, probably in a career.  I also felt she had much better on-screen chemistry with Stewart's character, a nearly penniless writer, than Grant's -- who's also a spoiled playboy.  Tracy and Dexter (Grant) had split before because they grew bored with each other, and her coldness drove Dexter to drink (his drying out is a sub-plot of  the film), but there's no reason to believe they won't tire of each other again.  Stewart, meanwhile, is an "every man" sort, as always, but his honesty would keep Tracy on her toes, and she probably wouldn't get bored of  him.  And, should she start to take advantage of him -- he'd call her on it.  I could also see Stewart prodding her into opening some type of writing or artsy-related business, such as a publishing house, art gallery, or artist's colony.  Not that Tracy's an artist, but she does have a head for business, and she seems genuinely interested in Stewart's book, not just flattering him.

There are a couple of misses in the film as well - Tracy's ill-fated second husband-to-be really should have been played by Ralph Bellamy-- we know she's not going to marry him, the romantic triangle is between Hepburn, Grant and Stewart, so why not cast the guy who never gets the girl?  Howard Hawks would have been a better directing choice -- and would have ramped-up the pacing of  the film.  The scenes with fast dialogue are some of  the best, but at 112 minutes the film runs a little long, and drags in places.  Hawks could have speeded up the dialogue and the plot (such as in his wonderful His Girl Friday).  And, as much as I like Grant - I don't think the film works with the plot of  Tracy Lord going back to her first husband.  On the one hand it makes her look like an on-screen Elizabeth Taylor, and on the other it seems terribly old-fashioned, almost as if to suggest a woman can't really be divorced.

Recommendation:  Worth seeing, but at times slow.
Rating:  3 out of  5 Stars
Next Film:  The Princess Bride

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Notorious

  • Title:  Notorious
  • Director:  Alfred Hitchcock
  • Date:  1946
  • Studio:  RKO
  • Genre:  Drama, Film Noir
  • Cast:  Cary Grant, Ingrid Bergman, Claude Rains
  • Format:  Standard, Black and White
  • DVD format:  R1, NTSC, (Criterion Collection, single disc)

"Waving the flag with one hand and picking pockets with the other, that's your patriotism."  -- Alicia


"I've always been scared of women, but I get over it." -- Devlin

In Hitchcock's Notorious, Ingrid Bergman plays Alicia, whose father's been tried for treason, found guilty and jailed.  We later learned that he "died in his cell", which is only marginally better than "shot while trying to escape".  Bergman is indifferent to her father's death, knowing he was a traitor (or as he put it in a recorded conversation - loyal to German and his own pocket) - but seems apolitical.  She is, however, a hopeless alcoholic, even driving drunk.  She meets Devlin at one of her parties, and quickly discovers he's an American agent.  He brings her to his bosses to use as an agent.  Reluctantly, she agrees and the two fly off to Rio.  It's interesting to note that Alicia's friends had also wanted her to take a vacation, but suggested Cuba!!!  Anyway, once in Rio, Alicia and Devlin discover what the job is that Devlin's un-named agency wants her to do.  She's to become romantically involved with Claude Rains' character, a man she knew as a young girl, and someone who seems to be supporting some shady scientists, though to what end is unknown - that is what Alicia is to find out.  Devlin isn't happy about Alicia's assignment, because the two have fallen for each other. Alicia, however, agrees.  She quickly forms an attachment to Rains -- and even marries him.  Devlin, meanwhle, becomes her handler - but gets more and more angry to see the woman he loves with another man.

Despite it's fantastic cast - Notorious is a very, very slow moving film.  Yes, the tension does build up, especially when Rains' mother discovers Alicia is an agent and begins to poison her coffee, but the pacing is so slow as to be irritating instead of suspenseful.  I actually found Rains to be the most fun - it's nice to see him in a juicy "bad guy" role as opposed the to lighter characters he normally plays.  Bergman is excellent as the newly minted tough-as-nail agent, but her easy submission into taking the poisoned coffee (and not realizing there might be a reason she feels so sick) undercuts her strong woman personna.  Grant, of course, rescues her at the end, but the film still has a strange ending (they leave the house, but we don't know, for sure, if Grant got to her in time for the poisoning to be reversed).  All in all - I think Notorious is a good example of a film that would work better as a TV series.  I'd have loved to see a pair of secret agents - one male, one female, who gradually fall for each other - and eventually marry.  It could be especially interesting if the woman still must "honeytrap" other spies as part of her job.  A TV series, however, could gradually work the relationship of  "Alicia" and "Devlin" -- making it more realistic, as well as dealing with the difficulties of a couple in such a dangerous profession.

But, getting back to the film, Grant is fantastic in Notorious - giving a subtle performance, and projecting a core of steel and violence.  I loved that.

Overall, though Notorious has it's good points and an excellent cast, it's like a novel by a great writer who needs an editor and without one writes books which are overly long.  The film really needed to be tightened up, the pacing improved, and the ending needs to be more concrete and less confusing.  Still, I would recommend it.

Recommendation:  See it.
Rating:  3.5 out of 5 Stars
Next Film:  The Philadelphia Story

Sunday, January 15, 2012

North by Northwest

  • Title:  North by Northwest
  • Director:  Alfred Hitchcock
  • Date:  1959
  • Studio:  MGM
  • Genre:  Suspense
  • Cast:  Cary Grant, Eva Marie Saint, James Mason, Leo G. Carroll, Edward Platt, Martin Landau
  • Format:  Technicolor, Widescreen
  • DVD Format:  R1, NTSC

"Hello?  Hello, Mother?  This is your son, Roger Thornhill..."  -- Roger (Cary Grant)


"Apparently, the poor sucker got mistaken for George Kaplan." -- Anonymous Spy 1
"How'd he get mistaken for George Kaplan, when George Kaplan doesn't even exist?" -- Anonymous Spy 2

North by Northwest is a very fun, enjoyable, romantic (in both senses) and exciting Hitchcock film.  The film's entire plot rests on a case of mistaken identity.  Grant is Roger Thornhill, an Madison Ave (NY) advertising executive, who is meeting some friends and business associates in a hotel bar, when he realizes he needs to send a telegram.  He raises his hand to call over the hotel telegram boy just as he's calling out for George Kaplan.  This is observed by two foreign agents, and thus the snowball starts to roll downhill.  The agents assume Thornhill is Kaplan, and kidnap him, taking him to a house in the country.  There, he is questioned, and forced to drink a bottle of  bourbon.  They then pour Thornhill into a car, hoping he will have a nasty accident.  Thornhill, however, is somewhat familiar with drunk driving, and he's able to make his escape, though he is spotted by the police and arrested for drunk driving.

The next morning, Thornhill and his lawyer, played by Edward Platt attempt to explain what happened.  Of course, there is no evidence at the country estate that anything happened, and the hostess who answers the door puts on a performance, claiming she was worried after he'd gotten tipsy at a dinner party.  Thornhill pays his $2.00 fine.

Thornhill then returns to New York, searches Kaplan's hotel room and goes to the United Nations building to meet Townend, the man who kidnapped him the previous night, he thinks.  But the man he meets isn't the Townsend (James Mason) who kidnapped him.  Before he can get any answers, or straighten out the mess, Townsend is killed by a thrown knife.  Thornhill, like an idiot, picks up the knife -- and his picture is snapped as he does so.  With no other choice, he goes on the lam, sneaking aboard a train bound for Chicago, because that was where Kaplan was scheduled to go.

Meanwhile, we meet "The Professor" (Leo G. Carroll) and his merry band of spies.  They discuss the issue of Thornhill, and their fake agent "Kaplan", as well as their real agent who will be in danger, if they step in and clear Thornhill.  "The Professor" declares they must do nothing.

On the Chicago-bound train, Thornhill meets Eve Kendall, who hides him.  Grant and Kendall immediately have a connection, trading flirty dialogue.  In Chicago, Kendall arranges for Grant to meet Kaplan; but we also see her talking to Leonard (Martin Landau), Townend's chief  henchman on the phone.  Kendall's directions lead Thornhill to a dry, dusty, deserted road in the middle of a cornfield.  He's attacked by a crop duster.

Thornhill survives that, confronts Kendall, and Grant's performance is excellent.  He's very icy and cold when he confronts her -- subtlely seething with anger that she betrayed him like that.  He then follows her to an auction.  Townsend (Mason), his henchmen, and "The Professor" as well as Kendall are all there.  When it looks like he's going to be caught by Townend's goons, Grant makes a scene at the auction and gets himself arrested.  But he's released and taken to the airport by Carroll.  "The Professor" explains more of  the plot, before taking him, by plane, to South Dakota.

There, by the Mt. Rushmore monument, the film winds down to it's conclusion.

Hitchcock uses a lot of very high angle shots in North by Northwest, almost like a kid with a new toy, but it does work.  Grant is fantastic as the confused innocent.  Eva Marie Saint plays Kendall with icy maturity, even in her more romantic scenes with Grant.  The supporting cast is great.  Leo G. Carroll, of  The Man from U.N.C.L.E. plays a very Waverly-like character as the un-named head of some un-named security organization.  In fact, the entire film almost seems like a pilot for The Man from U.N.C.L.E. at times, but with a much bigger budget.  Martin Landau is menacing, and quiet, as Leonard, James Mason's henchman.  And James Mason himself  has a cold, sophisticated, frightening evilness about him.  Edward Platt, of  TV's Get Smart , as a brief  but fun role as Thornhill's overworked lawyer.  Overall, the film is great fun.  The bi-wing crop duster chasing Grant in the cornfield, and the climatic chase across the face of  Mt. Rushmore are famous movie scenes, that are also quite enjoyable to see in tact and in context.

Recommendation:  See it!
Rating:  4 of 5 Stars
Next Film:  Notorious

Sunday, January 8, 2012

Network

I actually watched this on Thursday, fairly late at night, but with one thing or another this has been the first time I've been able to actually sit down and write my post.

  • Title:  Network
  • Director:  Sidney Lumet
  • Date:  1976
  • Studio:  MGM
  • Genre:  Drama
  • Cast:  Faye Dunaway, William Holden, Peter Finch, Robert Duvall, Ned Beatty
  • Format:  Color, Widescreen
  • Format:  R1, NTSC

"The American people are turning sour, they've been clobbered on all sides by Vietnam, Watergate, the inflation, the depression.  They've turned off, shot up, and they've f...ed themselves limp and nothing helps." -- Diana

"I don't have to tell you things are bad.  Everybody knows things are bad.  It's a depression.  Everyone's out of work or scared of  losing their job.  A dollar buys a nickel's worth.  Banks are going bust ... We know the air is unfit to breathe.  And our food is unfit to eat."  -- Howard Beale


"I want all of you to get up out of your chairs.  I want you to get up right now, and go to the window.  Open it, and stick your head out and yell:  I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!"  -- Howard Beale

Network, in a way, is bizarre and weird sort of film.  On the one hand, it's a "typical" 1970s heavy-hitting issue-oriented drama, warning of  the dangers of corporate takeovers of  television news, especially when news is asked to serve a corporate balance sheet rather than take seriously it's duty to inform the public.  But whereas other 70s dramas, such as Norma Rae, Silkwood, and The China Syndrome all feel somewhat dated now - Network, if  anything feels somewhat precognitive.  Large sections of  Network remind me of  the television series, Max  Headroom:  20 Minutes into the Future (made in England, but aired as first run in the US in 1987).  Network has some very funny moments, but it also has some very sardonic moments.  In a sense, the characters aren't really people you root for or against, rather the film manipulates its audience to understand the point of view of  the character speaking at the moment, only to reject that character's argument a moment later and agree with the opposite viewpoint.

Network does have a lot of  speeches, but they are often great.  Not just Howard Beale's speeches, which are memorable, but Ned Beatty as the chairman of  CCA has a marvelous, scary, chilling speech about not just the world consisting of corporations instead of countries -- but of  money instead of  idealogies.  He sees a world of systems, not a world of people.  A de-humanizing viewpoint, that seems all the closer now  than in the mid-1970s.  Meanwhile, Beale calls for people to protest - not to march in the streets, but to yell out, "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!"  When people do, he gets his own show which becomes a sideshow circus masquerading as News; but this actually shows "the masses" as just so many sheep, doing what they are told, believing what they are told, dressing as they are told, buying the things they are told to buy, etc.  Beale blames all of  this conformity on television, and even has speeches against it; yet, I think that message of  "manipulating the masses" cannot be laid solely at television's doorstep.  There are two reasons for this. One -- similar messages come from other places:  magazine ads, newspapers, even movies and pop fiction books; it's not a message that solely comes from a single medium, though that medium is so prevalent that it can be easy to notice and point to.  And, the second reason, is historic.  Great social leaders of the past (even those on the "wrong side") often had a way of articulating the feel in the air of  the masses and manipulating that into action.  So, Beale is, in essence, a fictional modern-day version of the leaders of the Russian Revolution, the French Revolution, or even the American Revolution.  The difference with Beale is we, as an audience, expect him to be stopped.  And he is.  Though by the end of the film, there is no feeling of   "something terrible has happened to a great man who could have changed things", rather his viewpoint, and his message are changed by the president of CCA to his philosophy - and that message is so unpopular with viewers, and lowers the ratings so much (and thus profits, since ratings determine the cost-per-minute of advertising) that Diana, the programming manager, and her cadre resort to desperate measures to get rid of  Beale.  The other aspect is, other than the shouting, and the rise and fall of Beale's show's ratings/popularity, no actual social movement ever develops.  Beale even says, in various ways, "I don't know what the solution is - I don't know what to do to change things."  So, other than two distinct instances, his audience doesn't know either, and no solutions, or social change is ever made.

The story of  Network, is that of  a fourth-place television network, that is going through major changes because they are losing so much money.  On the one hand, a corporation called CCA has bought the network and in order to save money, moves the formerly independent News Division to programming.  The news division itself  is also gutted.  People are fired, whole entire foreign news correspondence desks are closed, and then, making it almost impossible for the reporters and producers to actually report the news accurately and without bias -- it's moved to Programming.  Programming is the entertainment department of the network.  Diana is a bright young thing, desperately trying to show her stuff, to be hard hitting (in a male-dominated environment, she's the only woman and cannot ever afford to show her femininity), and desperately trying to pull the network out of  it's financial hole by trying anything.  It's very much the idea of - well, things cannot possibly get worse, we're already in last place, we're in the red, let's try this.  Only "this" is the craziest stuff you can imagine.  (Her other idea is a dramatic series featuring the weekly real crimes of a counter-culture-terrorist-criminal-"Marxist" organization.)  Howard Beale has spent his entire life in network television news.  Because his ratings are low, and he's perceived as "old and stodgy" he's given the news at the very beginning of the film that he's to be fired, and he only has two weeks left on his show.  He goes out with an old friend, the two get really drunk, and Howard says he'll kill himself.  His friend, not taking him seriously, says, "well, if you're going to do it -- do it on camera, I'm sure it will raise the ratings," or words to those effect.  The next day, during his regular broadcast, Howard threatens suicide, live, on the air.

What follows is the slow break-up of  a man.  He continues to break-up, on camera, delivering these wonderful, crazy speeches.  His friend, Max, is appalled and wants him committed, perceiving that Howard is truly losing it and having a breakdown.  Diana, however, now running the programming department, discovers that Beale's rants are having a positive effect on the ratings (again, ratings determine the profitability of the network by determining the cost-per-minute of advertising fees for selling ad-time).  She manages to first get Beale a regular "Commentary" block on the news.  As Beale's ratings soar, and Diana's influence grows, she eventually turns the news broadcast into a circus.  Besides Beale's rants, which are the centerpiece of the new "Howard Beale Show", there's "Sybil the Soothsayer" who predicts the next week's news; Jim Webbing and his "It's-Emmes-Truth" Department; and Vox Populi.  This isn't news -- it's a game show, a circus, but instead of  being a disaster -- it's very popular, and again the ratings soar.  Eventually, Beale starts attacking television itself, telling people to "turn off the tube".  You'd think this would be the moment where the ratings drop - but it isn't.  Then Beale discovers that CCA is being bought out by foreign nationals, specifically the Arabs, whom Beale had been blaming for weeks for the Oil Crisis (in the 1970s), and the resulting depression, and inflation (also in the 70s).  He urges people to send telegrams to the White House to stop the deal.  The telegrams are sent by the bushel load.  Eventually millions of  telegrams arrive.

This one piece of actual social action, stopping a foreign power from controlling the news, actually works.  However, the chairman of the board of CCA is angry.  He knows the deal is important.  He sees Arab investment in American holdings such as shipping, GM, CCA, etc. as a necessary way to but money back into the system.  He basically forces Beale to change his tactics and his speeches and his rants, and speak "his truth", "his philosophy".  Beale does, but in such a way that he depresses people and they tune the show out, and stop watching.  The ratings drop drastically.

Diana is then thrown into a tizzy.  She tries to find a replacement for Beale, to no avail.  She tries to convince her bosses to cancel or fire Beale, and that doesn't work.  She then finally resorts to desperate measures.

Network also has a quasi-documentary feel because of  the use of  a narrator all the way through to report on exactly what's going on, and to at times explain the plot.  The narrator also gets some very sardonic lines, lines that almost make you laugh and then you realise that what you are laughing at is in no way funny.  That device works extremely well in the film.

I highly recommend Network.  Many of  the concepts of  the film, such as foreign investment and control of the networks and the news have actually happened  (ABC for example is owned by Sony, a Japanese company).  Even the idea of corporations and systems and that fight with people and individuals is very modern.  And, as the quotes above show, certainly the true state of  affairs, such as the frequent mentions of the depression and inflation of  the 1970s, which are historic facts, should feel familiar to today's audiences.  The language of  the film is a bit rough - there's a lot of  swearing, and there's also a affair between Beale's friend Max and Diana.  However, those scenes outside the network, such as the scenes between Max and Diana, tend to be slow, until he actually finally breaks up with her because he sees her as very artificial.  Beale, also is not a sympathetic character because he is just a tiny bit too nuts.  But his speeches are certainly great.  And the nature of  the masses is also commented on in a political sense rather than in any sort of real sense.  But still a film that deserves to be seen.  It's one of  those films that could probably spark endless debate.

Finally, this is a very, very, intelligent film.  That is not meant to suggest "boring".  The language itself, and the dialogue, is notable for it's complexity and intelligence.  Often television people are dismissed as idiots; in this film that is far from the case.  One reason that all the opposing speeches seem so very convincing is that they are spoken by intelligent people who have reasons for their own viewpoints.  The things Diana says, the things the chairman of  CCA says, the things Max says (representing the old guard), even Beale's speeches give the audience something to think about, something to explore, something to further argue for or against or in the middle or even to suggest, "Well, how about this".  Network never talks down to its' audience, even when explaining necessary plot points such as the Ratings system and its' ties to revenue.  Even the narration, which could have been very much a "talking down" voice, is rather a very sardonic one, used solely to add explanation to the plot, even dates.  This is so refreshing compared to what is so common now where often television and film executives seem to not trust their audience, and to assume the audience (that is, the masses) is stupid.  I love that about Network.

Recommendation:  See it!
Rating:  4 out of  5
Next Film:  North by Northwest

Monday, January 2, 2012

personal note - Not Giving Up!

Hi all,

Well, observant readers of  this blog will have noticed that I passed my one-year deadline to watch all my movies and only reached "M".  However, I'm going to continue anyway, and review the rest.  Since I now have a total of 173, and will probably even buy more over time, it will take a few months.  But I am determined to continue anyway, and I hope somebody is reading and enjoying these reviews.

I'm also adding "decade" tags/labels to all movie review posts.  This will make it easier to find movies by date.  I will continue to list the copyright date of  the film in the cataloging block of each film review.

And now for some general observations and notes.  As I suspected, I don't think you can really say that films used to be better in the past than now.  Some of  the very best movies in my collection are from the 2000s:  Lord of  the Rings Trilogy, Master and Commander, Moulin Rouge, Batman Begins, (Batman) The Dark Knight.  I'd put any of  these films up against any movie from the past -- and they'd come out on top, and not simply because of advances in special effects.  I personally think special effects should be used to help realistically bring the story to the screen - and an effects-laden story without heart, without character, without story never means anything to me.  On the other hand, there is a tendency among film critics to sometimes dismiss a film simply because it uses a lot of  special effects.  This is frankly a ridiculous prejudice on the part of some film critics.  Some films need special effects in order to be told correctly and in order to work as a film -- it's another tool in the director's toolbox, like music, like sound design.

Another observation, and anyone who watches a lot of movies - and not just current movies, but all movies should have noticed this, is that each era seems to produce a certain type of  movie, or at least become known for a certain type of  movie.  The 1930s for example were known for musicals and the beginnings of  Film Noir.  Film Noir virtually defines the 1940s.  The 1970s, by contrast, were known for comedy.  The 2000s seem to be producing a lot of  big budget, effects-laden epics (a echo of the 1960s maybe?).  I wonder if any film historian or film studies professor has ever used a decade by decade approach to presenting the type of  films that defined a decade.

Well, the project will continue, so stay tuned.

--Jacqueline O. Moleski

Sunday, January 1, 2012

Moulin Rouge

  • Title:  Moulin Rouge
  • Director:  Baz Luhrmann
  • Date:  2001
  • Studio:  20th Century Fox
  • Genre:  Musical, Romance
  • Cast:  Nicole Kidman, Ewan McGregor, Jim Broadbent, Richard Roxburgh, David Wenham (Cameo)
  • Format:  Color, Widescreen
  • DVD Format:  R1, NTSC
"The greatest thing you'll ever learn is to love and to be loved in return."

"You expect me to believe that scantily clad, in the arms of another man, in the middle of the night, inside of an elephant, you were rehearsing?"  -- The Duke

"Hurt him to save him.  There is no other way.  The show must go on, Satine.  We are creatures of the underworld, we can't afford to love."  -- Zigler

Moulin Rouge is an incredible, incredible film.  The color, music and dancing all reflect a surreal, hyper-reality feel.  Yet the story is a simple story about love -- an impossible love.  Christian is a young naive Englishman who makes his way to Paris, to the heart of  the Bohemian Revolution to become a writer and experience love.  He quickly falls in with a group of  Bohemian artists, and is chosen to write their new show.  Needing backers, they go to the Moulin Rouge and Howard Zigler, and his head courtesan, Satine.

Through a misunderstanding, Christian meets Satine, and they fall in love.  However, Zigler needs money to convert his nightclub and bordello to a real theatre.  He promises Satine to the Duke.  The Duke even gets Zigler to sign over the deeds on the Moulin Rouge to him.

Satine is shocked to discover the man she's really falling in love with isn't a rich Duke after all, but a penniless Bohemian writer.  The plot revolves around their love triangle -- Christian and Satine and Satine and the Duke.  And the question is:  Will Satine, a Courtesan, choose true love with Christian or go for the money she can get from the Duke (which Zigler also encourages, since he'll lose the Moulin Rouge if she doesn't).  The love triangle is even built into the show that Christian is writing to debut on the new stage of the Moulin Rouge.  It may seem like a simple and traditional plot -- but what pulls Moulin Rouge out of  the commonplace is it's style and look.  A style that's surreal, hyper-reality, more real than real.  And Ewan McGregor as Christian and Nicole Kidman as Satine really do give the performances of their lives.  And my gosh can they both sing!

The majority of  the music in Moulin Rouge is modern music.  Rather than keeping to a historical look and feel to the film -- Baz Luhrmann goes completely in the opposite direction -- accentuating the way it would feel to someone in 1899-1900 to be in such a remarkable place.  The opening dance number is a whirl of  lights, color, movement and loud music.  One knows this won't be your typical musical when the can can girls and the men in white ties and black tails are singing and dancing to "Smells Like Teen Spirit".

Satine's song that she performs as a courtesan is a medley of  "Diamonds Are a Girl's Best Friend" and "Material Girl", though the song she sings when she's on her own is, "I'll Fly Away", because her ambition is to be a real actress - or at least to get out of  the Moulin Rouge.  Christian first courts her with Elton John's "Your Song", but he's most impressive with the song he writes for her, and the only original song in the film, "Come What May".  (Though "The Pitch/ Spectacular Spectacular" could be argued as original - only the lyrics are, the music is The Can Can.)

But it's surprising and even amusing to hear the modern music in the film, though the mood always fits.  "Elephant Love Melody", for example, is an argument between Christian and Satine where they throw lines from romantic pop songs at each other.  Zigler gets to sing "Like a Virgin" to the Duke, when he's trying to come up with an excuse as to why Satine has missed a date.  There's also a very impressive Latin Tango done to "Roxanne".  And many others.  It's also common for lines of dialogue in the film to be quotes from famous music (Christian even gets his writing job by quoting "The Sound of  Music").  Yet, somehow, it fits, it's like when you and your friends quote lines from movies you've seen or books you've read.  Christian, Satine, and even Zigler quote lines from music.

There are also some remarkable special effect sequences in the film - and as showy as they are, it merely emphases the point at the time.

But the most remarkable aspect of  this musical is the end - it really is astounding and surprising.  I've seen this film now several times and I always enjoy it and appreciate it more with every viewing.

Recommendation:  See it!
Rating 5 of  5 Stars
Next Film:  Network

Friday, December 30, 2011

Monty Python and the Holy Grail

Title:  Monty Python and the Holy Grail
Directors:  Terry Gilliam and Terry Jones
Date:  1975
Studio:  Columbia Tristar
Genre:  Comedy
Cast:  Graham Chapman, John Cleese, Eric Idle, Terry Gilliam, Terry Jones, Michael Palin, Connie Booth
Format:  Color, Widescreen
DVD Format:  R1, NTSC

"Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government."  -- Peasant


"Let me go back in there and face the peril."  -- Sir Galahad
"No, it's too perilous."  -- Sir Lancelot

Monty Python's Holy Grail film is very silly -- but I mean that in a good way.  The film is full of  very funny, and very quotable lines (I'm delibrately avoiding listing all of  them) and it's episodic.  However, it does have a plot -- it's not a collection of random sketches, like the Monty Python's Flying Circus TV series.

The film begins, well, before even the plot of the film gets started we're treated to the irrelevant humor of  the Pythons as the film is subtitled, for no apparent reason, in Swedish - then the subtitles break down into an invitation to visit  Sweden and a discussion of  moose bites.  A title card then informs us that those responsible for the titles have been sacked (fired).  The new titles are alternating red and green flashing, with lots of  mentions of  llamas.  Needless to say - this is no better.  But it is an example of  the clever Python humor.

The film, proper, begins with Arthur, king of the Britons, looking to collect the bravest knights in the land to join his court at Camelot.  But no one has heard of  him.  Eventually he finds Sir Bedevere, the clever, scholarly knight.  The film then breaks to "The Book of the Film" to briefly introduce Arthur's crew of knights (including "The aptly named 'Sir not appearing in this film' ") -- which is one of  my favorite lines.  Arthur and company encounter the French taunters, then each knight gets a tale from Sir Robin's encounter with the three-headed knight, to Sir Galadhad's bravely facing the women of Castle Anthrax, only to be "rescued" by Sir Lancelot.  Sir Lancelot himself gets his own tale, to rescue the person in Swamp Castle about to be forced into marriage -- he is very surprised to learn the person is a prince not a princess!

Arthur and Sir Bedevere encounter the Knight who say "Ni".  Finally the group meet Tim the Enchanter who gives them a clue.  They proceed to the cave and encounter the Killer Rabbit, before getting another clue leading to the bridge of  death.  There, each knight must answer three questions:  "What ... is your name?", "What ... is your quest?"  and either "What is your favorite color?" or an actual question.  This task manages to whittle down Arthur's knights, 'til it's only Arthur and one page who reach the castle where the Grail is hidden - only to again run into the French taunters.  Arthur, however, is about to seize the castle with an impressive group of  Ren-faire knights when the police show up and the film ends.  (Throughout the film we see clips of this - an old historian is cut down by one of  Arthur's knights, he's found dead by his wife, the police arrive, the body's taken away, the police start to investigate, etc -- all of  this is silent drama for the most part).

Terry Gilliam's drawings and animations, made famous in the Monty Python TV series, then later in films, break the episodes of  the film apart, and act as transitions.  They are quirky and surreal but add little to the plot (except for the sequence with the Black Beast in the cave; and Arthur's crew somehow being stranded in the snow in Iceland or some such place for no reason whatsoever).

Again, the film is very funny, and very silly.  There really isn't any logic too it, but it's Monty Python -- logic is the last thing one expects.  It's also intentionally low-budget looking.  For example, no one rides a horse, but the sound of  Arthur's horse is provided by two coconuts.   'Course, other characters actually notice this!  Again, it's a fun, enjoyable film.

Recommendation:  See it!
Rating:  4 of  5 Stars
Next Film:  Moulin Rouge

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World

  • Title:  Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World
  • Director:  Peter Weir
  • Date:  2003
  • Studio:  20th Century Fox, Miramax, Universal
  • Genre:  Action, Drama, Historical Epic
  • Cast:  Russell Crowe,   Paul Bettany, Billy Boyd, James D'Arcy
  • Format:  Color, Widescreen
  • DVD Format:  R1, NTSC
"Would you call me an aged man of war, Doctor?  The Surprise is not old.  She has a bluff bow, lovely lines. She's a fine sea bird, weatherly, stiff and fast.  Very fast, if  she's well handled.  No, she's not old.  She's in her prime." -- Captain Jack Aubrey

"This is the second time he's done this to me.  There will not be a third."  -- Captain Aubrey

"England is under threat of  invasion.  And though we be on the far side of  the world, this ship is England."  -- Captain Aubrey

I loved this movie the first time I saw it, and I really do enjoy it every time I re-watch it.  Peter Weir is a very talented director, who manages to balance the large scale, such as full-on battles between tall ships during the Napoleonic Wars, and the more intimate story of the unlikely friendship between the ship's doctor, a man of science; and the ship's captain, a life-long Navy man.

Master and Commander is set in 1805, and the HMS Surprise is a man o'war, captained by Jack Aubrey, a hard but fair man, lucky, but also experienced.  He's been in the service his entire life.  The ship's doctor is Stephen Maturin, - a man of  science, and a naturalist.  He's close enough friends with Aubrey to be able to challenge him, and speak his mind, especially when talking to Aubrey as his friend, rather than as a member of  the crew.  The film is based on a series of  several novels by Patrick o'Brian, specifically the two that form the film's compound title (the first introduces the characters, the second is the plot of  the film, since Weir wanted to do a plot involving a long sea voyage).

The film contains a lot of  beautiful historical details (I love the look of  the ship, especially when Aubrey stands alone on the top of a mast).  However, the film also doesn't shy away from the brutal historical facts of the life of sailors, especially naval sailors in the 19th century.  The crew of  HMS Surprise is shockingly young, and as the British are at war with France, the young die too.  We also see Aubrey order the flogging of a disrespectful sailor, not because he is cruel, but to keep discipline.  Life in his majesty's navy is tough, nasty, and often short -- and the film shows you that.

The plot of  the film is basically that of a cat and mouse game.  A French privateer frigate is harassing British whalers and merchant ships.  Aubrey is ordered to find the ship and - "sink, burn, or take her as a prize" as the film's opening printed narration tells the audience.  But the frigate vastly outguns the Surprise -- 44 guns to 28, with twice the crew, and the frigate has two decks to the man o'war's single deck.   The frigate also seems to be a cross between a ghost, a Flying Dutchman, and Jack's opposite number.  In two engagements, the Surprise is caught nearly unaware, and the frigate has the "weather gauge" or the advantage in the engagement.  In their final battle, Aubrey turns the tables and is able to successfully surprise the frigate, but at a high cost in lost men.

A secondary plot is the ship's doctor, a naturalist.  Because of  the damage done to the ship, in both the battles with the frigate and a journey around Cape Horn in a storm, one place Aubrey takes the ship during repairs is the Galapagos -- someplace Stephen would dearly like to explore, to collect and document new species of  wildlife.  But every time it looks like the ship might head there - the frigate shows up, and Aubrey must fight.

There is also a plot about one of  the Midshipmen being cursed as a "Jonah".  Basically, he's scapegoated for the ship's run of  bad luck.  He's the Midshipman whom another sailor disrespects, and gets lashed as a result.  The scapegoat plot is one of  several examples showing the innate superstition of  the sailors.  The Midshipman commits suicide, and the ship's luck begins to turn.  Though, Dr. Maturin is accidentally shot after the poor lad's death.  (Maturin is shot by one of  the Royal Marines who's taking pot shots at a following albatross.  Obviously, the guy never read "The Rime of  the Ancient Mariner").  Aubrey temporarily gives up his chase of  the frigate, so Maturin can be brought ashore to remove the bullet and cloth in his stomach.  Stephen does the surgery himself, using a mirror, and Aubrey keeps a hand on Maturin's belly to steady him.  It's one of  the more frightening scenes in the film - not that it's overly gross, but can you imagine operating on yourself?  Even if  it's the only way to survive?  Yikes!

The final battle is total chaos, then silence, then more chaos.  Aubrey looks fine, and in his element as he boards the enemy vessel.  Billy Boyd is also quite good in the scene!  For the most part, he's seen alot but doesn't get many lines, but it is nice to see him again.   Russell Crowe and Paul Bettany are perfectly cast, and have a great rapport with each other.  The rest of  the crew of  the HMS Surprise slowly move from faces to having personalities.

One thing both Aubrey and Maturin share is a love of  music.  Aubrey plays violin and Maturin the cello; and there duets in the captain's cabin are some of  the best moments in a film that is full of  excellent moments.

Again, Weir's direction really is very, very good -- and he's now one of  my favorite directors.  There are plenty of  gorgeous shots in this film:  the ship at full sale, the creatures in the Galapagos Islands, etc.  There are also plenty of  terrifying shots:  the storm around Cape Horn, the battle scenes.  But the driving force of  the story is the friendship of Aubrey and Maturin; and the comradeship between the sailors on the ship.

I have the two-disc collector's edition and it really is a beautiful DVD set.   The set looks like old parchment, with line drawings of  Crowe and the ship.  The special features are located on the second disc and there are plenty of  them and they are enjoyable to watch.  I also found that I learned from the special features, especially about the different techniques used in the production of  the film.

Recommendation:  See it!
Rating:  5 of 5 Stars
Next Film:  Monty Python and the Holy Grail

Friday, December 23, 2011

Mary Poppins

  • Title:  Mary Poppins
  • Director:  Robert Stevenson
  • Date: 1964
  • Studio:  Disney
  • Genre:  Musical, Children
  • Cast:  Julie Andrews, Dick Van Dyke, David Tomlinson, Glynis Johns, Hermoine Baddeley, Reta Shaw, Karen Dotrice, Matthew Garber 
  • Format:  Technicolor, Widescreen
  • DVD Format:  R1, NTSC (40th Anniversary 2-disc ed)
"Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with facts."  -- George Banks


"As I expected:  'Mary Poppins, practically perfect in every way.' " -- Mary Poppins


"I never explain anything."  -- Mary Poppins


"You know, begging you pardon, but the one my heart goes out to is your father. There he is in that cold, heartless bank day after day, hemmed in by mounds of cold, heartless money. I don't like to see any living thing caged up."  -- Bert
"Father? In a cage?"  -- Jane
"They makes cages in all sizes and shapes, you know. Bank-shaped, some of 'em, carpets and all." --Bert


Mary Poppins is a wonderfully inventive film made for children but that the entire family can still enjoy.  The animation looks a bit flat by today's standards, however the film's music and storyline still hold up.  Set in 1910, Mr. Banks is a banker with two children and a wife.  His wife is involved in the Suffragette movement (to give women the right to vote).  It's implied the children are holy terrors -- the Banks have fired six nannies in four months.  However, Mary Poppins shows up and takes the children through a series of adventures, with her friend, Bert - a Cockney who makes money any way he can (as a one-man band, painting chalk drawings on the sidewalk, selling roasted chestnuts, even as a chimney sweep).  But it's Mary's ability to loosen up the stiff, cold, and indifferent Mr. Banks and bring him closer to his own children that is at the heart of this film.


Though largely live-action, with plenty of special effects, the entire section where Mary, Bert, and the children jump through a chalk drawing and have adventures in a park is animated.  This is classic Disney animation, and the technique of combining animation with live action was new when the film was made.  It does look a bit dated now, but the dances, music, and even excitement of things such as the horse race, or Mary and Bert being carried across the animated river by animated turtles still work.


This film is also filled with music, song, and dance  -- and contains some of Disney's best songs:  "A Spoonful of Sugar", "Chim-Chim Cheree", and "Supercallifragilisticexpialidocious! " -- all of which I knew as a child and can still sing along to and even recite.  (I still have all of "Supercallifragilisticexpialidocious! " memorized!


Please note in the list below I am not including a single line or two of a main song repeated later.


List of Songs and Musical Numbers 


Sister Suffragettes -- Mrs. Banks
The Age of Men/Banks Schedule -- Mr. Banks
The Nanny Song (a desperate advertisement) -- Jane and Michael Banks
A Spoonful of Sugar -- Mary Poppins
Chim Chim Cheree -- Bert
Jolly Holiday (with Mary) -- Bert, Mary
Supercallifragilisticexpialidocious! -- Mary, Bert, Ensemble
Stay Awake (a lullaby) -- Mary
I Love to Laugh -- Ed Wynn
Feed the Birds (Tuppence a Bag) -- Mary
Investing in the Bank / Interest -- The Bankers
Chim Chim Cheeree -- Bert
Step in Time -- Bert, Ensemble
Let's Go Fly a Kite -- Mr. Banks


Again a wonderful film, especially for children.


Oh, and I should say that I am aware that the life of chimney sweeps and the children they used was not a good one, and also that Suffragettes were treated horribly, often force-fed and jailed, but that still doesn't stop this from being a good fantasy film.  However, I do find it amusing that Disney cleaned-up the old British saying, that "it's good luck to kiss a chimney sweep", changing it to "good luck will rub off if I shake-hands with you."


Recommendation:  See it!
Rating:   4 of 5 Stars
Next Film:  Master and Commander:  The Far Side of  the World

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

Gone with the Wind

If you are wondering why I didn't cover this movie before now, I had seen it before, of course, and it's a great film, but I didn't own it on DVD.  I just bought the 2-disc version a few weeks ago, and finally got a chance to watch it over the last two nights  (It's 234 minutes long, and is spread over two discs).  So another bonus review.  And it's fitting -- this is my 100th review!  Woo-hoo!
  • Title:  Gone with the Wind
  • Director:  Victor Fleming
  • Date:  1939
  • Studio:  MGM
  • Genre:  Classic, Romance, Historical Epic
  • Cast:  Vivien Leigh, Clark Gable, Leslie Howard, Olivia deHavilland, Ann Rutherford
  • Format:  Technicolor, Standard
  • DVD Format:  R1, NTSC
"Most of the miseries of the world were caused by wars, and when the wars were over -- no one ever knew what they were about."  -- Ashley Wilkes


"No, I don't think I will kiss you.  Although you need kissing and badly, that's what's wrong with you.  You should be kissed and often, and by someone who knows how."  -- Rhett Butler


"What a woman!" -- Rhett Butler

Gone with the Wind sweeps you into it's story gradually but completely.  You are quickly immersed in the story and the characters.  And the film is really Scarlett's story.  Scarlett O'Hara, despite first appearances, in a way is a very modern character, and at times a strong woman.  She's manipulative, determined, strong and feisty, and she knows what she wants (or thinks she does).  She's willing to do whatever she has to do, whenever she has to.  Scarlett is in sharp contrast to Melanie (deHavilland) who's kind and generous -- to a fault, and weak and even, at times, a bit simple.  Melanie can be strong (watch her face down Union troopers in the second half of the film for example), and she's honest about her feelings and in her marriage to Ashley (her much older cousin).  DeHavilland is fantastic in her thankless role as the perfect Melanie.  Scarlett's sisters never learn anything about strength, or getting what they want (which is simply a husband to care and provide for them) and whine and simper-on throughout the film.  Scarlett never once whines or complains, not really, she just does what needs to be done, or what she thinks she needs to do (and she doesn't care at all who she hurts in the process).  Essentially Scarlett's a bitch in both the good and bad sense of  the word.  Because in some circles to be a bitch is a compliment, and in some circles it's the only way to really survive.  And whatever else you say about Scarlett O'Hara -- she's a survivor.

When we meet Scarlett, she's not that impressive -- she comes off as dumb, and shallow, concerned only with her looks, and her beaus.  But even in the beginning of the film it's suggested she's not as dumb as she pretends - she just acts that way because it's how she's been taught and how she thinks she can get a man.  However, she soon finds out the man she's "wanted", who she thinks really loves her, Ashley Wilkes (Leslie Howard) from the plantation next door, is going to marry his cousin Melanie, instead.  We aren't told if  this is an arranged marriage or a love match.  Ashley and Melanie are actually well suited to each other -- both are kind and gentle, always doing what's expected, never raising any controversy, filling their roles the way one was expected to -- given the times and their statuses.  Scarlett, throughout the film says both aloud and by her actions that she loves Ashley and that she's convinced he loves her -- even when both are married to other people.

The war (the American Civil War) comes and all the men go off to fight.  Ashley and Melanie have been married.  Scarlett, in a fit of pique, marries Charles, Melanie's brother, even though Charles was her sister's beau.  Charles dies of pneumonia during the war.  Scarlett really doesn't care, and even rebels at wearing Widow's Weeds and not dancing at the next round of society balls (which at this point are only being held as war fund raisers).  She gives in to convention, though, and manages to look stunning in black.  (At the time, only a widow would have worn black, especially at a society function).  During the society ball, she manages to arrange things so each of  the women will be "auctioned off" for dances.  Rhett Butler bids on and wins Scarlett.  She's so desperate to dance, she takes him up on it, claiming it's for charity (we know it's not).  Rhett is the dashing stranger -- he's avoided service in the war because he has no desire to get himself  killed and he hates all the waste of  war.  Rhett's a gambler, a blockade runner, and a rakish rogue.  He's trouble and considering Scarlett is as well -- they are very suited to each other.  Even Rhett says to her, they are two of a kind.

Scarlett and Melanie end up in Atlanta, working as nurses to help the wounded.  Scarlett doesn't particularly like this duty, but she knows she must do it.  Melanie has Ashley's baby (nine months after his Christmas leave). She's sick and ill just before and during the birth, but Scarlett manages to figure out and help with the process.  By this time, the war is nearly over, and Sherman's troops are marching on Atlanta.  Rhett comes to the rescue of  the three women (Scarlett, Melanie, and Scarlett's maid, Prissy) and the baby.  He gets them out of Atlanta and safely on the road to Tara, Scarlett's home, then leaves, informing Scarlett he's going to join the war effort for a last stand.

Scarlett manages to make it the rest on the way on her own, seeing Twelve Oaks (the Wilkes plantation) burned to the ground on the way.  Tara's survived, but her family's in ruins:  her mother has died, her sisters are still weak and ill from a fever that killed her mother, and her father's gone out of  his head from shock.  Saddled with a another sickly and physically weak woman and a baby, Scarlett endures.  She finds that her home still stands, but it sits in the middle of  a wasteland, and there's no food or money.  Scarlett runs out into a field, eats a carrot she finds, and starts to throw up.  Then  she holds up her hand, "As God as my witness, I'll never be hungry again," she swears.  This is the end of part one, and the intermission card is on the DVD.

Part two picks up during the Reconstruction.  Scarlett is told she needs three hundred dollars to pay the taxes on her home.  That might not sound like much, but in the 1860s/1870s it was a small fortune, especially when you have absolutely no way of  making any money.  Scarlett uses a pair of drapes to sew herself a new dress and tries to get the money from Rhett Butler.  He's in a union jail (stockade) and can't access his money which is in a London bank.  (After all, it's not like they had ATMs back then, and though he could access his funds via bank draft, it could be traced and the money taken -- this is a risk Butler isn't willing to take).  Scarlett then runs into Frank Kennedy, another of  Sue Ellen (her sister's) beaus.  She marries Frank to get at his money that he's made running a general merchandise store, and convinces him to buy the lumber mill next door.  Scarlett saves Tara, but lives in Atlanta, running the mill and lumber business.

Scarlett proves to be a shrewd businesswoman, running the mill (though Ashley Wilkes is her partner in name), at a time when women seldom worked, much less ran their own businesses.  However, one day she takes a horse and buggy (another concept the ladies in town find scandelous - Scarlett driving her own buggy, alone) through a bad area of  town.  She's attacked.  Rhett Butler shows up and rescues her.  Scarlett, Melanie and the other girls have a sewing party, and Scarlett knows something is going on, but doesn't know what.  She later learns Ashley, her husband, Frank, and several other men have gone to attack the men who attacked Scarlett.  Frank's killed.  Ashley returns, wounded, but alive.  (Rhett again comes to the rescue, faking being drunk, with Ashley faking being even drunker, as in the local doctor, so they can get into Tara which is being guarded by Reconstructionist/Union troops on the lookout for the men who attacked the men who attacked Scarlett).  A widow again, and in Widow weeds, again, Rhett proposes to Scarlett.  They marry and soon have a daughter, Bonnie.

Scarlett, however, is so vain, that after the birth of  her daughter, she decides not to have any more children because it will ruin her figure.  Rhett considers divorcing Scarlett when she tells him this, but decides to stay.  He's fallen for Scarlett, despite their tendency to constantly fight, and Scarlett's drinking issues.
When Bonnie's around eight, Rhett gets fed-up and takes Bonnie with him on a trip to England, when they return dual tragedies occur:  Bonnie's killed in a horse-jumping accident (it really is one of  the saddest moments of the entire film), and Scarlett, who's gotten pregnant again, despite her intentions, falls/is pushed down a flight of stairs, gets sick, and has a miscarriage.  Her second pregnancy is interesting anyway because it's the result of  something seldom talked about now, and certainly not in 1939 -- marital rape.  (She's drunk/he's drunk -- they fight, he carries her up the stairs and literally has his way with her, then leaves for London the next day).  Also, the scene on the stairs between Rhett and Scarlett is filmed in such a way that we really don't know if  Scarlett fell by accident, if she fell accidentally on purpose to anger Rhett, or if  Rhett was so angry at her he pushed her without thinking.  Whatever -- he's devastated  by the two losses.  It doesn't help that though Scarlett calls out for him, all the women around her decide not to tell  Rhett she wants him with her when she's ill.  Shortly thereafter, Melanie, who was told not to have more children, get's pregnant, has a miscarriage, and dies of  sepsis  (or possibly pre-eclampsia).  She even tells Scarlett to look after  Ashley for her.  Scarlett talks to Ashley though, and finally realises she really loves Rhett, and her feelings for Ashley were a childish crush and a pipe dream.  She goes to tell Rhett -- but he basically doesn't believe her and leaves her.  In the end, Scarlett's bereft and without a man, but she realises that she does still have the one thing that really matters -- land, Tara, her home.   Somehow, Scarlett will be just fine.

Gone with the Wind really is a great film.  It's more than simply a romance or a war film.  It's unusual in that the entire film is told from the point of view of a woman -- and not a goody-goody woman, but a woman who's complex, scheming and manipulative.  And unlike the designing women or femme fatales of  the Film Noir films, Scarlett isn't made to fatally suffer for her mis-doings.  The film sweeps you up and into it's world and it's characters.  Vivien Leigh is gorgeous, and gives an incredible performance as Scarlett.  Clark Gable is fantastic as Rhett Butler.  The rest of  the cast shine in their roles, sometimes in the smallest and simplest scenes (such as the conversation between Melanie and the Atlanta madam Miss Belle after she hides Ashley and saves his life).

The film also looks gorgeous -- it's a early Technicolor film, and the colors just pop right off  the screen.  I loved the restoration work on my copy -- it looks brand new, with no color bleeding or red cast.  There are scenes in Gone with the Wind that still impress, such as the burning of  Atlanta.  The film is of course, based on a novel, and print screen cards appear not just at the beginning of  the film, but throughout the movie explaining what is going on, especially in the larger canvas of  the Civil War -- it adds to the scope of  the film.

The politics of  the film deserve a mention -- this is a film that white-washes (no pun intended) the Old South, and slavery in particular.  Blacks (called "darkies" in the film -- even by Scarlett and Rhett) are referred to as servants, not the slaves they were.  They are also portrayed as being well treated and taken care of  and happy with their lot (something that simply wasn't true).  The film is definitely sympathetic to the South.  However, that speaks volumes about the times when the film was made (1939) and the times the film portrays (the 1860s) as well as the point-of-view of  the author of  the book.  Students can learn from such a film what attitudes were in the past, and then learn what the harsh realities were.
About the famous slapping scene, though -- often it's taken, completely out of  context as an example of  the film's racism.  In reality, when Scarlett slaps Prissy -- she's hysterical.  Scarlett could have easily have slapped a white woman who was behaving in such a fashion.  And Scarlett pretty much slaps everyone in the film at one point or another (including her sister, Rhett, Ashley, and possibly even Melanie - but again to wake her up).  Slapping Prissy is not out of  character for Scarlett, it's in character.  And considering Prissy's hysterical at the time -- she needed to be slapped (it's film grammar for shutting up a hysterical woman).  Besides, in the film's context -- Prissy is Scarlett's slave, not a servant, and technically Scarlett had the right to hit her.  Not that it's right, but there you go.  There's a lot more in Gone with the Wind that is on the racist side, but that scene isn't one of  those things.  It certainly isn't something worth banning the film for, as has been proposed occasionally.

Overall, a really remarkable film and a must see.

Recommendation:  See it!
Rating:  5 of 5 Stars
Next Film:  Mary Poppins

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Happy Feet

  • Title:  Happy Feet
  • Director:  George Miller
  • Date:  2006
  • Studio:  Warner Brothers Animation
  • Genre:  Musical, Animation, Children's
  • Cast:  Elijah Wood, Robin Williams, Hugh Jackman, Nicole Kidman, Hugo Weaving, Anthony LaPaglia, Steve Irwin
  • Format:  Color, Widescreen
  • DVD Format:  R1, NTSC
"What fabulous worlds lay out there far beyond the ice?  Was there anyplace one small penguin without a Heartsong could ever truly belong?" -- Lovelace / Narrator

I truly enjoyed this movie when I first saw it in 2006, but only recently found it on DVD on sale, albeit the 1-disc edition.  Thus this bonus review.  However, the movie is still excellent and the animation is astounding!  In Happy Feet penguins court their one true love by singing their unique Heart Song.  However, baby Mumble can't sing.  He can dance, though.  Mumble (Elijah Wood) is a fantastic tap dancer (especially for a penguin).  However, the other penguins think this is weird, and ultimately the Elder Penguin (Hugo Weaving) kicks poor Mumble out, blaming him for the famine that's troubling Emperor (penguin) Land.  Mumble having heard about strange aliens tries to find out why they are taking the fish and has a series of adventures, meeting a group of  Latino penguins, led by Ramon (Robin Williams), the guru Rockhopper penguin, Lovelace (also Robin Williams), and ultimately ending up in a zoo.  His dancing attracts attention, and Mumble returns to Emperor Land.

There he again courts his childhood sweetheart, Gloria, and wins her, with his dancing.  I loved the sequences between Gloria and Mumble, I really did.  The Elder Penguin again gets upset, but the aliens (man) shows up and issues edicts to ban fishing in Antarctic waters.  The penguins are saved.

The music in this film is Motown -- and extremely well integrated into the plot, as is Mumble's dancing.  Mumble needs to be true to himself, and ultimately he is.  The animation is incredible -- the ice looks like ice, the water looks like water, and even the snow isn't as fake looking as filmed snow normally is.  At one point wind blows and we see Mumble fur move.  And of course, the dancing penguins, all in time, works perfectly. Mumble is adorable, and his story works well and is very enjoyable.  Again I really enjoyed this film.

The special features on the single disc version are a little disappointing -- music videos, an old Merrie Melodies cartoon, one trailer, and probably the most useful special feature - a lesson in tap dancing by the film's choreographer -- though that is geared for children.  Still the film is worth having.

Recommendation:  See it!
Rating:  4
Next Film:  Either Mary Poppins or Gone with the Wind (another film I just recently picked up on sale)

Monday, December 12, 2011

The Maltese Falcon (1931)

  • Title:  The Maltese Falcon (1931)
  • Director:  Roy Del Ruth
  • Date:  1931
  • Studio:  Warner Brothers
  • Genre:  Mystery, Film Noir, Drama
  • Cast:  Ricardo Cortez, Bebe Daniels
  • Format:  Standard, Black and White
  • DVD Format:  R1, NTSC
“This is murder and don’t you forget it!”  -- Police Detective Dundee

This film is one of two earlier versions of Dashiell Hammett classic mystery included on the Warner Brothers three-disc  special edition of the classic Film Noir version starring Humphrey Bogart from 1941.  I actually avoided watching it for over a week.  However, it wasn’t as bad as I feared it might be.  It’s no classic, but it’s not a disaster either.

Richard Cortez plays Sam Spade as a hopeless flirt, who trades quips with his secretary and is definitely having an affair with his partner’s wife (something alluded to in the 1941 edition, but definitely toned down).  Archer, moreover, knows about his wife’s indiscretions.   The only woman Sam doesn’t seem to flirt with, is his client, Ms. Wonderly.

Since we actually see Archer in this film, he’s slightly more sympathetic.

Watching the 1931 version of  The Maltese Falcon is very much like watching a stage play version of a favorite film.  Much of  the  dialogue is the same or recognizable, but it’s delivered completely differently by a different crew of actors, none of whom are well-known.  I didn’t mind flirty Sam Spade, though Bogart gives a much more nuanced and haunted performance.  Bogart’s Spade is a man on the edge.  Cortez breezes through the film like he’s having a grand  time, and even reminded me a bit of Errol Flynn.  Bebe Daniels, in a way, I actually liked better than Mary Astor.  At least she’s fairly straight-forward, even when she’s lying to Sam.  (This version drops her multiple identites from the plot).  But the bit players – Cairo, Gutman, even Wilbur are very bland here.  The 1941 version is much better with Peter Lorre, Syndey Greenstreet and Elisha Cook Jr.

This film is much shorter (around 71 minutes), and less complicated.  And, like a play, many larger (more expensive to film) scenes are dropped or mentioned but not shown (we never see Archer’s body, or  the burning of La Poloma, the ship that brings the Falcon to San Francisco).  Also cut is some of Sam’s wondering around the streets of his city, thinking things over.

Recommendation:  Skip it, unless you happen to get a free version as an extra, then you may as well watch it.
Rating:  2.5 Stars
Next Film:  Mary Poppins